ECPA Reform Bill Attracts Majority Support in House

This morning, Congress has taken a significant step towards defining privacy for the digital age in a way that will benefit startup companies and their users. The Email Privacy Act -- a common-sense piece of legislation that would bring ECPA (the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) better in line with how the Internet actually works -- is supported by a majority of the House of Representatives. This kind of support, before a bill even comes to a vote, is an important sign that policymakers and their constituents understand that something must be done.

The Email Privacy Act gives online documents the same privacy protections granted to physical documents. Specifically, the bill would require government agencies to obtain warrants from a judge in order to force service providers to disclose private emails and documents they store online for their customers.

Since data play an increasingly important role for many startups, any uncertainty over compliance increases the burden of time and resources needed to handle the issue. The current status quo also disenfranchises businesses and consumers, and places an added strain on user trust. Under the current law, a complex legal request from law enforcement would force businesses to chose between facing fines and legal action while protecting their users, or complying with the government at the cost of alienating users.

The Email Privacy Act clarifies existing law, and provides a much-needed update to bring regulations in line with the digital age. We thank Reps. Yoder and Polis for their leadership on this important issue, and with majority support we look now to House leadership to move this bill, and we hope they act swiftly to pass this common sense reform.

Big Day for Open DATA

The Federal Government has taken a big step towards reforming the way it buys, uses, maintains, and publishes data with the unanimous passage of the Digital Accountability and Transparency or DATA Act.

The bipartisan measure, which now goes to President Obama for his signature, would open up the way we track spending across government agencies, and was sponsored originally in the House by Oversight and Reform by Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Ranking Member Representative Elijah Cummings (D-MD). A companion Senate measure was sponsored by Senators Mark Warner (D-VA) and Rob Portman (R-OH).

What does this mean in practice? Hudson Hollister, Executive Director of the Data Transparency Coalition, explained what the DATA act will do for government transparency in Forbes earlier this month:

If the DATA Act is fully enforced, citizens will be able to track government spending on a particular contractor or from a particular program, payment by payment. Agencies will be able to deploy sophisticated Big Data analytics to illuminate, and eliminate, waste and fraud. And states and universities will be able to automate their complex federal grant reporting tasks, freeing up more tax dollars for their intended use.

This sort of transparency in government allows ordinary citizens to better track how government is using technology, and it will also allow government to better source information technology projects, and understand how tax dollars are being spent in an effort to streamline those multifaceted processes.

Of course, there will also be benefits for the startup community. Understanding how government money is being spent could make it easier for our most innovative companies to break through the procurement process.

We applaud the work of Chairman Issa, Ranking Member Cummings, Senators Warner and Portman, and everyone else who helped shepherd this vital legislation through the Congress. We look forward to continued efforts to leverage data in productive ways. 

Why You Should Care About ECPA Reform

This piece was originally published in Venture Beat

The law that governs our interactions with the Internet was passed in 1986. Yes, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act — ECPA — became law before the Internet was widely used and at a time when most people did not have computers in their homes.

ECPA is out of date and out of its depth. But changing a law that touches as many industries and interactions as ECPA does takes a lot of political appetite and will. So why should you care?

Despite original intentions, ECPA is the touchstone privacy law protecting and governing our information and interactions online. So, among other things, it has been used by the government to argue that anything stored online for longer than 180 days has been“discarded” and therefore does not qualify for Fourth Amendment protection — the freedom from unwarranted search and seizure, and the right to privacy.

In other words, all those emails and Dropbox documents you’ve had for over six months can be obtained by law enforcement without a probable cause warrant. This includes the IRS, FBI, and DEA, as well as state and local law enforcement agencies.

So there’s the personal problem of having our online data unprotected by the Fourth Amendment — but that’s just the beginning. Since ECPA is being used to tackle questions outside of its original scope, and is therefore interpreted at will and applied unevenly, the ensuing uncertainty has an adverse impact on startups (read: small, fast-growing companies that are creating economic value and jobs).

Since data plays an increasingly important role for many technology startups, any uncertainty over compliance increases the burden of time and resources needed to unravel the issue. In addition, laws like this that disempower businesses and consumers place an added strain on user trust. Under ECPA, a complex legal request from law enforcement would force businesses to chose between facing fines and legal action while protecting their users, or complying with the government at the cost of alienating users. During the Occupy Wall Street protests last year, Twitter was caught up in all this while trying to protect a user’s Fourth Amendment rights against the unwarranted seizure of tweets over 180 days old. In the end, however, Twitter surrendered the data to avoid hefty fines.

This obvious disparity between the statute books and reality of how we use the Internet to communicate has already led to a bi-partisan push for reform, championed by the original ECPA author — Senator Patrick Leahy. Senator Leahy is joined by co-sponsor Senator Lee who explained that “when ECPA was enacted, email was primarily a means of communicating information, not storing it. Today, we use our email accounts as digital filing cabinets, where we store many of the personal documents and sensitive information that the Fourth Amendment was meant to protect. This bill takes an essential step toward ensuring that the private life of Americans remains private.”

There is also a reform bill in the House sponsored by Representative Kevin Yoder. The Email Privacy Act has 137 co-sponsors, but if it’s actually going to pass this do-nothing Congress, we need to take action. It’s worth noting here that the 113th Congress is on course to pass less legislation than any Congress in history. So far, it’s passed only 49 laws. The original “Do Nothing’’ Congress denounced by President Harry Truman in 1947, however, passed 906 laws.

And if that’s not a big enough hurdle, all reform legislation is now being blocked by the Securities and Exchange Commission in the hope of a special carve-out so regulatory agencies can continue to access our online documents without a warrant. Clearly, any such exception would undercut the purpose of reform.

So what can you do?

1. Sign the White House petition. Call on the White House to break its silence and stand up for ECPA reform. We need President Obama to tell the SEC to back down in its demands and make clear that the time for ECPA reform is now. The petition needs 100,000 signatures by December 12th. That’s next Thursday!

2. Join the TechFreedom Thunderclap to show your support and raise awareness about the need for reform.

3. Do your own evangelizing on social media using #ECPA and #GetAWarrant. You can also share these infographics from the ACLU and TechFreedom to educate others.

The right to privacy and the freedom from unwarranted search and seizure are not to be taken lightly. And as we live more of our lives online, it is essential that the law catches up.

Right to Know or Right to Innovate?

In recent weeks, California legislators have shown renewed interest in redrafting online privacy regulations, leading to the introduction of over a dozen bills and the creation of a Select Committee on Privacy to help “update California privacy from the brick and mortar world.” Most efforts have been focused on AB1291 -- the Right to Know Act. While supporters of this two-year  bill -- including EFF and the ACLU -- claim it offers more transparency and much needed updates to privacy laws, there are almost no additional protections to users, and the bill imposes significant hardship on startups.

As we spend more time on the internet, conducting more of the business of our lives, online privacy has rightfully come to the forefront of efforts by government regulators and advocacy organizations. Regulations are necessary to protect children, prevent abusive marketing, and allow consumers to make informed choices about the products they use. Unfortunately, Right to Know does none of that.

This bill offers few, if any, improvements to the existing “Shine the Light” law, which already requires businesses to provide information to consumers about direct disclosures of personal information to third parties. At the heart of Right to Know is a new requirement that businesses make all “reasonably available” user data available upon request -- thousands and thousands of pages of it. This ‘give us everything’ mentality might feel right from an intuitive perspective, but it does not improve transparency (what does “reasonably available” even mean?), and it makes data more costly.

For a small startup, this bill is like a regulatory DDoS attack -- there just aren’t enough resources to hunt down all the data about users, especially when you consider the ever-changing nature of databases in growing companies. The beauty of startups is that we collect every piece of information until we can determine what is useful, allowing us to innovate and improve products along the way.

As more consumer-facing services live online, there is a continued need for trust between users and service providers. Startups -- the pioneers of the next great technologies -- need to foster that trust, but giving users thousands of pages of data will not do much to help consumers make informed choices. Right to Know, though well intentioned, will not help consumers make smarter decisions about products, but it could stifle the innovation of startups.

Bill to Amend 1986 Communications Privacy Law Goes to Senate

Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT.), author of the original Electronic Communications Privacy Act (or ECPA), is once again pushing for amendments that take into account rapid advances in technology since, er, 1986. Passing the Senate Judiciary Committee today, the bill will soon be debated by the Senate.

In Leahy’s own words, the “bill takes several important steps to improve Americans’ digital privacy rights, while also promoting new technologies -- like cloud computing -- and accommodating the legitimate needs of law enforcement.”

Engine, together with a coalition of tech companies, is pleased with the clarity this new act brings to how content can be accessed by government; excluding emergencies, law enforcement must obtain a warrant in order to compel a service provider to disclose the private content of users.

Since data plays an increasingly important role for many startups, uncertainty about compliance increases the burden of time and resources, and puts a strain on user trust. Currently, a complex legal request from law enforcement would force startups to chose between legal action and alienating users.

The bipartisan Amendment Act is co-sponsored by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT). “When ECPA was enacted”, Senator Lee explained, “email was primarily a means of communicating information, not storing it. Today, we use our email accounts as digital filing cabinets, where we store many of the personal documents and sensitive information that the Fourth Amendment was meant to protect. This bill takes an essential step toward ensuring that the private life of Americans remains private.”

Here’s a rundown of this new bill:

• Search warrant required for email and other electronic communications, when those communications are stored with a third-party service provider.
• Requirement does not apply to other Federal crimina or national security laws including Wiretap Act and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978
• Government can use administrative, civil discovery and grand jury subpoena to obtain corporate email and other electronic communications directly from a corporate entity, when the content is on an internal email systemGovernment can use civil discovery subpoenas to obtain non-content information
• Bill eliminates the outdated “180-day” rule that calls for different legal standards for the government to obtain email content depending upon the age of an email
• Government must notify an individual whose electronic communications have been disclosed within 10 days of obtaining a search warrant, but they can also seek a court order to delay this notice in order to protect integrity of ongoing investigations

Tweet at any or all of the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee listed below to tell them that protecting data matters to startups.

Chairman Patrick Leahy @SenatorLeahy

Sen. Michael Lee @SenMikeLee

Ranking Member Charles Grassley @ChuckGrassley

Sen. Dianne Feinstein @SenFeinstein

Sen. Orrin Hatch @Orrin Hatch

Sen. Chuck Schumer @ChuckSchumer

Sen. Dick Durbin @SenatorDurbin

Sen. Jeff Sessions @SenatorSessions

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse @SenWhitehouse

Sen. Lindsey Graham @GrahamBlog

Sen. Amy Klobuchar @amyklobuchar

Sen. John Cornyn @JohnCornyn

Sen. Al Franken @alfranken

Sen. Christopher Coons @ChrisCoons

Sen. Richard Blumenthal @SenBlumenthal

Sen. Ted Cruz @TedCruz

Sen. Jeff Flake @JeffFlake

Sen. Mazie Hirono @maziehirono

Photo courtesy of Talk Radio News Service.

Tell Congress to Protect Startup Data

Today, Engine and a coalition of more than 20 organizations call on Congress to require law enforcement to secure a warrant before asking businesses turn over user data. Data plays an increasingly important role for startups. This week, the Senate Judiciary Committee is slated to vote on a proposal that would change the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) rules outlining how the government can access digital data.

ECPA was enacted in 1986 and is in need of an update. Innovations like cloud computing are available to businesses of all sizes and have changed the way data is stored and transmitted. The government must set clear due process protections -- such as securing a warrant -- to access consumer data through businesses.

Startups and other innovative companies leverage all sorts of data to make products better, ranging from location data to make map applications more accurate, to transaction information that prevents fraud. A lack of clarity under the current law imposes problems for companies.

Uncertainty about compliance increases legal costs that most startups are generally unprepared to take on. Also, giving up customer data can erode the trust of users. Receiving a complex legal request from the government for user data can put startups in a bind, forcing them to decide between absorbing unforeseen legal costs or alienating current and prospective users.

Engine has joined with a coalition of technology, industry, and civil liberties organizations to call on Congress to reform ECPA in order to create greater legal certainty around user data. Today is your chance to get involved by telling the Senate Judiciary Committee to make data, privacy, and due process a priority.

Click here to tell Congress that your digital data deserves the same protections as your mail and phone calls. You can also tweet at any or all of the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee listed below to tell them that protecting data matters to startups.

Chairman Patrick Leahy @SenatorLeahy

Ranking Member Charles Grassley @ChuckGrassley

Sen. Herb Kohl contact form

Sen. Dianne Feinstein @SenFeinstein

Sen. Orrin Hatch @Orrin Hatch

Sen. Chuck Schumer @ChuckSchumer

Sen. Jon Kyl @SenJonKyl

Sen. Dick Durbin @SenatorDurbin

Sen. Jeff Sessions @SenatorSessions

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse @SenWhitehouse

Sen. Lindsey Graham @GrahamBlog

Sen. Amy Klobuchar @amyklobuchar

Sen. John Cornyn @JohnCornyn

Sen. Al Franken @alfranken

Sen. Michael Lee @SenMikeLee

Sen. Christopher Coons @ChrisCoons

Sen. Tom Coburn @TomCoburn

Sen. Richard Blumenthal @SenBlumenthal

Technology for Economic Progress

Nmachi Jidenma is an international development specialist passionate about using technology for development. She focuses on International Entrepreneurship at Engine. @nmachijidenma

Last week, I was at the Techonomy 2012 conference in Tucson, Arizona, where about 250 technology and business leaders gathered to explore how technology and innovation can accelerate progress in business and society. At the conference, various issues at the intersection of technology and the economy were explored in what proved to be an enriching, intellectual dialogue. From futurist Ray Kurzweil’s discourse on the merger of man and machine, to researcher Gordon Bell’s discussions on lifelogging and its impact on augmented memory, I left the conference with a stronger faith in technology’s role in improving society.

Among the various “techonomic” issues explored, what struck home for me was the impact a mobile world and big data can have in transforming economies in emerging regions of the world.

In recent years, the world has witnessed an explosion of data as billions of new devices connect to the Internet. By some estimates, in the past two years, ten times more data has been created than in all of human history. Though the privacy and security implications of this data remain issues of concern, its potential use cases are significant. When used for good, big data can be used to mine and model various social issues around the world from food shortages to the dynamics of global urbanization.

In regions like Africa, the impact can be tremendous. Already, the continent is experiencing paradigm-shifting growth. In the past decade, six of the world’s top ten fastest growing economies have been from Africa. With the current boom in mobile technology adoption, the potential of technology to enable the continent to leapfrog decades of economic progress and usher in prosperity for the populace is immense. From finance to healthcare, there is an opportunity to empower hundreds of millions of people through a confluence in the use of mobile technology and big data intelligence. The runaway success of M-Pesa in Kenya provides evidence of the sort of revolutionizing effect technology can have on emerging economies. The hope is that the next decade will usher in smarter governance through mobile data.

At the same time, the rising influence of robotics technology and its future impact on the face of unemployment and job growth both in the U.S. and abroad is of particular importance. As robotics ushers in more efficiency and just-in-time processes to a dynamic planet, how do these trends affect job growth domestically and internationally as well as the future of work? How do they affect the future of emerging regions of the world and their future roles in the global economy? How do they affect business processes such as outsourcing and the skill sets needed to compete in an increasingly automated world?

At Engine, these questions are important to us because they bring to the fore technology's important role in shaping the global economy. We are passionate about how things like mobile and big data can be used for good around the world, especially in emerging regions where technological progress can significantly fast track development. There is a unique opportunity for governments to use actionable information from data patterns to shape policy in a rapidly changing world. That way, we can build a smarter planet and a more prosperous future for all.

reroute/sf: a New Model for City-Startup Collaboration

This weekend Engine, along with the City of San Francisco and friends in the tech community, will co-host reroute/sf, a hackathon in which engineers, designers, and business minded folks will form teams to build technology that aims to improve transit in San Francisco.

When our team met with representatives from the City of San Francisco and the SFMTA eight months ago, our message was simple: let’s work together to find technological solutions to overcome the transit challenges affecting the city. Access to transit is important for growing businesses aiming to establish and keep their headquarters in San Francisco.

The problem? Finding a constructive way to address San Franciscans’ transit frustrations in a way that works within the City’s infrastructure and resource constraints. To avoid the pitfalls of similar attempts and ensure real change, a new approach had to be taken -- we had to work closely with the City and local civic organizations to engineer immediately applicable and actionable solutions.

Mark Wills, a designer at Hattery, came up with reroute/sf, a hackathon that uses technology to address problems that citizens and the City agree need to be fixed. We worked together with local officials to determine the core challenges that technology might be able to solve, and we have energized the technology community behind the potential to make their city a better place to live.

This weekend, we’re ready to open our doors for reroute/sf, with the hope that our friends who code, design, and pitch will deliver interesting and useful inventions to help improve our City. The SFMTA has committed to working with the winning teams to make their innovations real, and Google Maps has generously provided grants for the winners to support this collaborative work.

While we aspire to produce new transit technologies this weekend, we also hope for reroute/sf to be a model for future partnerships between the City and the startup community.

Startups, Privacy & the FTC

Derek Parham is a startup advisor and a member of the Engine steering committee. This is an opinion piece and should not be construed as legal advice. @derekparham

Too few startups understand complex compliance requirements and the government could better communicate guidelines and regulations to entrepreneurs. This was the consensus reached at a roundtable meeting with Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen of the Federal Trade Commission and members of the San Francisco startup community Wednesday morning.

The Commissioner joined members of San Francisco startup community at Engine to speak about the agency’s outreach to entrepreneurs and small businesses. Discourse between the startup community and Washington is critical to bridging the divide between the two groups. This kind of hands-on information sharing is invaluable to making sure policymakers gain technical experience with the real-world application of new technologies that they are regulating.

The FTC is eager to get startups involved in its consumer protection process. The problem is, small startups may not have the resources -- or the wherewithal -- to focus on compliance with FTC regulations. They are directing their resources toward growth and dealing with regulations is sidelined until the company gets big enough or successful enough. Often the compliance department of a company doesn’t exist until the startup is thinking about going public. But there are simple ways for startups to meet basic requirements. FTC regulators care a lot about the statements in privacy policies. So making a concerted effort when creating it, as well as checking it monthly to make sure it is still accurate is a super easy way to make regulators happy -- not to mention your users.

We need our community to become educated on FTC regulations that impact them. Privacy policies do matter, no matter how big your company is right now. And the FTC in turn needs to continue the open discourse with our community that we saw yesterday with Commissioner Olhausen at Engine. The FTC maintains a website, and a very active twitter feed which provide an avenue for keeping up on regulatory changes that are likely to impact your company. And of course, watch this space.

Watch Commissioner Brill @ Engine for State of the Net West

Commissioner Julie Brill of the Federal Trade Commission joined us yesterday to discuss issues impacting technology companies at an event co-hosted by Engine as part of the Congressional Internet Caucus’ State of the Net West series. The commissioner heard from entrepreneurs, policy wonks, journalists, and activists in the technology and startup ecosystems. You can watch the event in full here:

FTC Commissioner Julie Brill @ Engine from Engine Advocacy on Vimeo.

We are encouraged by federal regulators’ increased interest in connecting with entrepreneurs on policies that influence their businesses. Q&A from the crowd touched on a number of tech policy subjects including Do Not Track standards, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), the commission’s work on mobile app privacy, and its actions against larger companies like Facebook and Google. The conversation primarily centered on regulations’ impact on innovation across the internet economy.

The FTC has focused on providing guidelines to developers to better and more clearly inform mobile app users. A recent Pew Internet and American Life Project survey found that more than half of people that use apps decided not to download a program based on information about the data it would need to collect to operate. It will be important for the commission to keep in mind the sophistication of users as it continues to pursue guidelines on the amount of information and disclosure imposed on mobile developers.

We will continue to host events that connect entrepreneurs and startups to policymakers and we hope to continue our partnership with the Congressional Internet Caucus in the future. If you would like to find out more about Engine events join us as a member and we’ll keep you in the loop.

Startups: Talk Data Reg with FTC Commissioner Brill

Engine is excited to host a townhall with Commissioner Julie Brill of the Federal Trade Commission Wednesday at 4:00 pm. Join us for the event at The Hattery in SOMA (414 Brannan Street, San Francisco, California). Video will be available after if you can’t attend. We’re bringing together startups, entrepreneurs, policy wonks, and lawmakers to talk about data, privacy, and other policies that impact small businesses and technology firms. Commissioner Brill’s visit is part of the Congressional Internet Caucus’ State of the Net West series.

Why should startups care about the FTC? The agency has been working to create guidelines for businesses on consumer privacy, releasing its “final report” on the subject March 26. Data exchange is central to the relationship between internet-based businesses and their consumers. Maintaining and enhancing trust between innovators and users will be critical to the continued success of startups across the web.

While the commission has focused on large tech companies, search engines, internet service providers, data brokers, and web browsers, perspective from dynamic young companies may help in the construction of policies that preserve the internet ecosystem that has opened doors for entrepreneurs.

Large companies tend to have established practices that are easily conveyed to users and the government. Startups, on the other hand, often change strategy, business model, or size rapidly and require a great deal of flexibility. Policymakers must be mindful of these difference as they consider rules that would affect tech companies of all ages and sizes.

Data’s regulation is one of the areas addressed in the issue book we circulated at the party nominating conventions a few weeks ago. So far, the government has taken a relatively low-impact approach to the regulation of data in the form of privacy, cybersecurity, and data breach rules. Calls for the government to become more involved have intensified in recent years. It’s critical that startups and entrepreneurs make their voices heard in this debate to ensure that the opportunity to innovate remains open.

Dialogue between entrepreneurs and lawmakers like Commissioner Brill will be critical to the success of government and business. For new rules to effectively protect customers, businesses must be able to grow, innovate, and offer new products to consumers. Engine’s goal is to foster these connections, inject startups into the policy dialogue, and promote entrepreneurship in Washington and beyond.

Photo courtesy of Priya Deonarain.

June 13 Midweek Policy Update

This week in Washington: Cybersecurity legislation may move forward in the Senate, ICANN releases a list of proposed generic top-level domains, the United States Patent Office promotes clean energy partnerships.

Cybersecurity

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid put his colleagues “on notice” June 10, calling on democrats and republicans to work together to pass cybersecurity legislation that has stalled in previous Senate sessions. The bill faces stern resistance from many technology-focused groups concerned about its impact on privacy.

Open Data

Representative Darrell Issa announced on June 10 the OpenGov Foundation at the Personal Democracy Forum in New York City. OpenGov would allow citizens to actively engage in the policy-writing process through open, web-based technology. Issa is looking for developers to build the tool.

Patent

The USPTO held a meeting of clean technology stakeholders in an effort to improve and expand its clean technology program. Issues discussed included the importance of regional accelerators and an update on cleantech patents.

Spectrum

The FCC holds an open meeting June 13 in which the commissioners will consider moves to make more efficient use of high frequency spectrum for a nationwide interoperable public safety network.

DNS

Also on June 13, the International Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) holds a press conference unveiling the generic top-level domains applied for in the organization’s expansion program. The application window for the new domains -- which could include .lol and .nyc -- closed May 30. A release from the organization reports that more than 1,900 applications were received.

Midweek Policy Roundup

Immigration

Senators Jerry Moran, Mark Warner, Marco Rubio, and Chris Coons introduced Startup Act 2.0 on May 22, building on measures introduced in December 2011 that create more visas for immigrants with advanced degrees in STEM fields, among other critical reforms for startups. Engine’s coverage here.

Privacy

The Federal Trade Commission announced the final agenda for a May 30 workshop focused on privacy disclosures for advertising and social media on mobile devices. The workshop, titled “In Short: Advertising & Privacy Disclosures in a Digital World,” will include participants from companies such as Facebook, Groupon, and TRUSTe. 

The FTC also announced the hiring of Paul Ohm, an associate professor at the University of Colorado, to serve as senior policy advisor for consumer protection and competition issues in the agency’s Office of Policy Planning. Mr. Ohm specializes in information privacy, computer crime law, intellectual property and criminal procedure, according to his personal website. 

Spectrum

The Federal Communications Commission held a workshop on channel sharing May 22. Channel sharing is an approach to broadcasting where two stations use the same broadcast infrastructure and television channel. This may maximize the amount of spectrum available in new wireless auctions. The commission will also consider a report and order on plans to ease the transition from 2G to more advanced technologies at its open hearing May 24. 

Cybersecurity

On May 21, Senator Ron Wyden gave a speech on the Senate floor opposing any cybersecurity legislation that would limit Americans’ privacy. The speech came as the Senate is said to be considering new cybersecurity legislation. Watch the speech here. 

Midweek Policy Highlights

This week in Washington: the FTC goes deeper on privacy, Facebook amends its SEC filing to account for potential regulatory review, and immigration and spectrum remain hot topics.

Finance

Facebook amended its S-1 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ahead of its initial public offering May 15. The filing extended the expected closure date of the $1 billion Instragram purchase from the second quarter of 2012 to 2012 generally. The move could signal deeper scrutiny by regulators on the competitive impact of the deal. Currently, the transaction is in a procedural 30-day review under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act premerger notification program. Engine will continue to monitor the review and its potential impact on future startup acquisitions.

Privacy

Associate director of the Federal Trade Commission’s division of privacy and identity protection Maneesha Mithal spoke at a Congressional Internet Caucus event on Monday about the agency’s recent report on privacy. She highlighted recent settlements with social networks including MySpace that involved companies’ adherence to their privacy policies.

Edward Felton, the agency’s chief technologist on leave from Princeton University’s Center for Information and Technology Policy, also blogged this week on the technical details of recent moves by the government to address privacy on social media platforms.

Immigration

Engine blogged earlier this week on moves by the Department of Homeland Security and Congress that may help startups gain access to more highly-skilled immigrant workers. Senator John Cornyn is said to be introducing a bill that would boost the number of visas available to immigrants with graduate degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields.

Spectrum

Federal Communications Commission chairman Julius Genachowski is slated to give a speech May 17 at 10:30 EST on spectrum reallocated to support “medical body area networks” (MBAN). GE Healthcare and Philips Healthcare are scheduled to demo MBAN devices. Repurposing spectrum for new technologies is a major priority to open innovation across industries and MBAN is a major development in the healthcare field. A live stream can be viewed here.