We Need to Expand Access to Education, Not Curtail it with Outdated BPPE Regulations

This post is by Tina Lee, founder and CEO of MotherCoders, a non-profit that helps moms on-ramp to technical careers in the new economy.

In many ways San Francisco is now a very different place than the one where I was born and raised in the 1970s. But that’s not surprising considering how much the world has changed -- vastly transformed by globalization and the advent of the internet. What is so troubling, however, is not that the world changes, but that public policy has been so slow to catch up. This was made all too clear when the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education (BPPE), a unit of California’s Department of Consumer Affairs charged with licensing and regulating postsecondary education, moved to shut down education programs like Hack Reactor, App Academy and others.

While the marketplace has been driving technological change at a rapid and unprecedented rate, our civic institutions have been slow to adapt. Yet the health of our economy – not to mention our democracy – is dependent upon strategic policymaking that will ensure that everyone has equal opportunity to thrive in this new world. And one thing that’s always provided a promising pathway to social mobility in the U.S. is education – the kind that prepares Americans for participation in the economy through the acquisition of skills and knowledge that match market demands.

Right now the market desperately needs people with digital skills to fuel the growth of our innovation in economy, and people with software programming skills are in the greatest demand. In other words, there are plenty of job openings requiring software programming skills that offer growth potential and good wages, but not enough people to fill them.

In this environment, it’s no wonder people are flocking to coding bootcamps to retool their skill-set, especially since these programs take less time to complete than traditional academic and vocational programs, plus they offer mentorship and direct connections to local companies looking to hire. That’s why the recent move to shut down these programs is so troubling.

At a time when the digital divide is becoming dangerously synonymous with the opportunity divide, this seems emblematic of a larger disconnect between policy and reality. The fact is that demand for technology skills will only continue to grow as we shift further away from an industrial-based economy. According by research conducted by CODE2040 – a non-profit that’s working to increase the number Blacks and Latinos in tech -- there will 1.4 million new tech jobs by 2020, 70 percent of which will go unfilled unless we create more pathways to technology training.

As an educator actively working to bridge the digital divide in underserved communities, I know we should be focused on expanding access, not curtailing it. In fact, that’s the reason I founded MotherCoders – a non-profit organization that offers a tech orientation program designed to on-ramp moms to technical careers. By providing on-site childcare for mothers who want to learn basic computer programming, expand their understanding of the technology landscape, and network with peers and industry professionals, we’re doing our part to create a more dynamic, sustainable, and inclusive economy. And when our moms complete their tech orientation program, I want coding bootcamps to be an available resource for them for further skill development so that they can advance their careers.

While the role of regulation is critical in protecting consumers, and bootcamps on notice are working to comply, in this case the BPPE rules are due for an update. Many BPPE rules pertain to the operations of traditional, brick-and-mortar, post-secondary academic institutions, with language devoted to the governance of satellite campuses, on-site learning resources such as libraries and physical equipment, and administrative staff.

Satellite campuses? Anyone with a web enabled device can now become one;

Libraries? Almost all of the world’s knowledge has been digitized and made available online;

Physical equipment? All you need is access to a computer, an internet connection, and maybe a printer;

Administrative staff? Everything from HR to accounting to IT can be accessed as a service mediated by internet technology.

It’s very clear that these rules do not yet reflect how profoundly internet technologies have transformed the way our society works, and certainly not how coding bootcamps -- a new means of workforce development -- works.

To keep the U.S. competitive in the innovation game, it’s time to adapt our education policies so everyone has a chance to thrive in our new economy. My hope is that policymakers will work with citizens and industry alike to create the conditions necessary for building a diverse and inclusive twenty-first century workforce capable of competing in a fast-changing, technology-driven, globalized world.

Tina Lee is a mother of two young daughters and founder and CEO of MotherCoders, a non-profit that helps moms on-ramp to technical careers in the new economy. A lifelong San Franciscan who was raised in Chinatown by an immigrant grandmother, she holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political, Legal and Economic Analysis, with an emphasis in Economics, and an MBA from Mills College. She also holds an M.A. in Education from the Stanford University Graduate School of Education’s Learning, Design & Technology Program.

2014: Tech Policy Issues to Watch

It seems that every year has gotten busier and busier in the world of tech policy -- and that’s generally a good thing. This morning’s news that a federal court has struck down FCC net neutrality rules is a battle we will have to fight, but we should still take heart from the fact that the issues we have cared about for years are becoming more mainstream, and policymakers around the world are starting to listen. While we haven’t forgotten that 2014 is an election year, we’re confident that on the federal level there is room for improvement in a number of areas close to the hearts of innovators and entrepreneurs. So here’s a quick, early roundup of what we expect to be watching in 2014.

Patents

In the last weeks of 2013, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Innovation Act, a litigation reform bill targeting patent trolls and their extortive, anti-innovation practices.

This year, we’re pushing for a companion bill in the Senate, a body that has signaled stronger wariness than we encountered in the House. It’s going to be an uphill battle, but we must make certain that 2013 was the last good year for patent trolls. Similarly, the House and Senate Commerce committees have both expressed an interest in demand letter reforms to tackle the current anonymity and vagueness.

Together with our many friends -- retailers, real estate agents, and others -- we will be working closely with the House and Senate to build legislation that is beneficial but does not risk being overturned by the courts on First Amendment grounds. But to lay the foundation for everything we do, we must remind Congress that we are the inventors driving our economy.

User Privacy

The technology we love makes information more accessible and useful. Usually that’s a good thing, but unfortunately it also means that private information sometimes gets out against our wishes. With some high profile breaches (think Target and Snapchat) at the end of 2013 we expect to see more political appetite for privacy “reforms”.

While we have yet to see any formal bills, we expect both federal and state-level reform efforts to tackle the big question of protecting consumer privacy without threatening needed innovation. Up until now, a lack of understanding on the part of lawmakers has often meant that reforms can do more harm than good by threatening to limit the free exchange of data and ideas. We need to be more mindful here, and at the same time we must work within the tech industry to safeguard user data, develop better security practices, and create easy-to-use tools that are available for the average user to help them monitor and protect their data.

Data Localization

We’re already seeing foreign governments use the Edward Snowden revelations as an excuse to slow the growth of US-based technology companies. Most concerning is a push toward what insiders are calling “data localization” -- a requirement that all country-specific user data must be consistently maintained within that country. For example, French user data must only be analyzed or stored in France. That means service providers -- since that data is used to provide a useful service -- will be forced to maintain a duplicate set of infrastructure in every country. This is a problem because most countries lack the intellectual property and security standards we enjoy in the United States. And after all, it’s those policies that have long contributed to this country’s incredible record of innovative success.

Just this week, I had the opportunity to talk to new Commerce Secretary Pritzker about the challenges the U.S. will face should governments such as Brazil and France go ahead with mandated localization. It's something credit card companies have faced for years, but now it’s a growing threat to technology companies whose businesses and users rely on the borderless functionality.

Forced data localization will drive up costs, slow deployment times, reduce innovation, push U.S. jobs overseas, and generally threaten our safety and security. The administration should make time for the right discussions with individual nations, and the U.S. Commerce Department should take the opportunity to caution against such moves, making certain that the legacy of this episode is one of increased freedom and actual security, rather than a paranoid, reactive clampdown on the free flow of information.

Copyright

We’ve been excited to see content distributors updating their revenue models and making more of their content libraries available through new and innovative channels. But we’re always cautious of the incumbent interests that troll the halls of government in the name of protecting creators. Data has shown that often these incumbents are misguided in their assertions.

While no one has offered-up a policy solution -- lest it becomes the next SOPA -- Representative Goodlatte wants to undertake a multi-year, multi-stakeholder process aimed at comprehensive reform. And it all last week with a Congressional copyright hearing.

Immigration

An outdated immigration system continues to be one of the greatest threats to American entrepreneurship and business growth. As we demonstrated in 2013, high-skilled immigration creates jobs and raises wages, and it is disappointing to have to use this year to continue to build our case.

With the mid-term Congressional elections ahead of us in November, the conventional wisdom in Washington generally holds that getting a deal on something as broad and controversial as immigration reform would be a non-starter. But as the pressure continues to mount on Congressional Republicans to take charge and fix our broken immigration system, there may be opportunities to advance that debate -- and even pass legislation that would address the crisis. Having spent much of the last two years making the economic case for immigration reform, it’s up to all of us to keep the pressure on and make sure that an achievable fix becomes law. It’s a long shot this year, but we remain hopeful that as opportunities present themselves, we can all rise to meet the challenge.

Research

Not to be relegated to a footnote, this year, the Engine Research team will keep producing great research as we did in 2013, highlighting the role startups play outside the United States, the importance of access to high-speed connectivity, and user privacy. It is clear that to accomplish all the goals we have set for ourselves -- and for our community -- we must continue to be rooted in the facts: hard data that makes our path clear, our points incontrovertible, and our needs readily apparent. We don’t have the ability to be patient and try “politics as usual”. Jobs remain on the line.

What's Up With Patent Reform?

With momentous bipartisan support not often seen from Congress these days, the Innovation Act, targeting patent trolls and their abusive practices, passed the House of Representatives with 325 votes to 91. That this Congress, with its historic levels of impasse, was able to come together to pass this bill speaks volumes about the extent of the patent troll problem. As some of us know all too well, patent assertion entities have cost US businesses time, talent and money -- not to mention the incalculable chilling effect their tendencies for extortionist litigation have had on innovation.

Now, the patent reform effort moves to the Senate with the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act introduced by Senators Leahy and Lee. The Senate bill reflects some provisions from the House bill, including fee-shifting and a system that would allow stays in lawsuits against customers and end users -- but this bill definitely is more narrowly focused on egregious litigation abuses.

This bill suggests new guidelines for dealing with demand letters. Under Senator Leahy’s Act, demand letters must include a statement of the patent asserter’s identity, the patent being asserted, and the reasons for the assertion. Additionally, the Senate bill would authorize the FTC to act against unfair and deceptive practices associated with the sending of fraudulent or materially misleading demand letters. With a nod to the root of the problem -- poor quality patents -- this bill would also improve patent review procedures requiring that the PTO apply the same claim construction used in court, rather than the “broadest reasonable interpretation.”

While Democratic leaders on the House Judiciary Committee announced their support for the Leahy-Lee approach over Representative Goodlatte's House bill, a number of Senators are urging general restraint after pushback from the university community and unease over loser-pays provisions.

We hope the Senate will act, as the House already has, with determination and all speed to remedy this issue. While there is also hope on the judicial front with the Supreme Court is set to consider the validity of software patents, every day we wait to address the scourge of patent trolling we’re wasting millions of dollars combatting a problem we can begin to remedy with the stroke of a pen. We look forward to working with our allies in the Senate to bring this bill up for a speedy resolution.

Photo courtesy of Talk Radio News Service.

Why You Should Care About ECPA Reform

This piece was originally published in Venture Beat

The law that governs our interactions with the Internet was passed in 1986. Yes, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act — ECPA — became law before the Internet was widely used and at a time when most people did not have computers in their homes.

ECPA is out of date and out of its depth. But changing a law that touches as many industries and interactions as ECPA does takes a lot of political appetite and will. So why should you care?

Despite original intentions, ECPA is the touchstone privacy law protecting and governing our information and interactions online. So, among other things, it has been used by the government to argue that anything stored online for longer than 180 days has been“discarded” and therefore does not qualify for Fourth Amendment protection — the freedom from unwarranted search and seizure, and the right to privacy.

In other words, all those emails and Dropbox documents you’ve had for over six months can be obtained by law enforcement without a probable cause warrant. This includes the IRS, FBI, and DEA, as well as state and local law enforcement agencies.

So there’s the personal problem of having our online data unprotected by the Fourth Amendment — but that’s just the beginning. Since ECPA is being used to tackle questions outside of its original scope, and is therefore interpreted at will and applied unevenly, the ensuing uncertainty has an adverse impact on startups (read: small, fast-growing companies that are creating economic value and jobs).

Since data plays an increasingly important role for many technology startups, any uncertainty over compliance increases the burden of time and resources needed to unravel the issue. In addition, laws like this that disempower businesses and consumers place an added strain on user trust. Under ECPA, a complex legal request from law enforcement would force businesses to chose between facing fines and legal action while protecting their users, or complying with the government at the cost of alienating users. During the Occupy Wall Street protests last year, Twitter was caught up in all this while trying to protect a user’s Fourth Amendment rights against the unwarranted seizure of tweets over 180 days old. In the end, however, Twitter surrendered the data to avoid hefty fines.

This obvious disparity between the statute books and reality of how we use the Internet to communicate has already led to a bi-partisan push for reform, championed by the original ECPA author — Senator Patrick Leahy. Senator Leahy is joined by co-sponsor Senator Lee who explained that “when ECPA was enacted, email was primarily a means of communicating information, not storing it. Today, we use our email accounts as digital filing cabinets, where we store many of the personal documents and sensitive information that the Fourth Amendment was meant to protect. This bill takes an essential step toward ensuring that the private life of Americans remains private.”

There is also a reform bill in the House sponsored by Representative Kevin Yoder. The Email Privacy Act has 137 co-sponsors, but if it’s actually going to pass this do-nothing Congress, we need to take action. It’s worth noting here that the 113th Congress is on course to pass less legislation than any Congress in history. So far, it’s passed only 49 laws. The original “Do Nothing’’ Congress denounced by President Harry Truman in 1947, however, passed 906 laws.

And if that’s not a big enough hurdle, all reform legislation is now being blocked by the Securities and Exchange Commission in the hope of a special carve-out so regulatory agencies can continue to access our online documents without a warrant. Clearly, any such exception would undercut the purpose of reform.

So what can you do?

1. Sign the White House petition. Call on the White House to break its silence and stand up for ECPA reform. We need President Obama to tell the SEC to back down in its demands and make clear that the time for ECPA reform is now. The petition needs 100,000 signatures by December 12th. That’s next Thursday!

2. Join the TechFreedom Thunderclap to show your support and raise awareness about the need for reform.

3. Do your own evangelizing on social media using #ECPA and #GetAWarrant. You can also share these infographics from the ACLU and TechFreedom to educate others.

The right to privacy and the freedom from unwarranted search and seizure are not to be taken lightly. And as we live more of our lives online, it is essential that the law catches up.